Smart ForFour 2014 vs Smart ForTwo 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.0 (petrol) | 0.8 - 1.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 90 HP | 54 - 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 91 - 136 NM | 89 - 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 16.9 seconds | 8.9 - 16.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 4.7 | 4.2 - 5.2 | |
|
Smart ForFour petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Smart ForTwo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.49 m | 2.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.56 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Smart ForFour is larger, but slightly lower. Smart ForFour is 80 cm longer than the Smart ForTwo, 10 cm wider, while the height of Smart ForFour is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 185 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | no data | |
|
Smart ForTwo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Smart ForFour has 35 litres less trunk space than the Smart ForTwo. This could mean that the Smart ForFour uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 8.7 meters | 8.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Smart ForFour is 0.1 metres less than that of the Smart ForTwo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`419 | ~ 1`035 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForFour has
|
Smart ForTwo has
| |