Smart ForFour 2014 vs Citroen C1 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Smart ForFour is available with rear wheel drive, while Citroen C1 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 0.9 - 1.0 | 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 - 90 HP | 68 HP | |
Torque: | 91 - 136 NM | 93 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 16.9 seconds | 13.7 - 14 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 4.7 | 4.5 - 4.6 | |
Smart ForFour petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen C1. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.49 m | 3.44 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.47 m | |
Smart ForFour is larger. Smart ForFour is 6 cm longer than the Citroen C1, width is practically the same , while the height of Smart ForFour is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 185 litres | 139 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 751 litres | |
Smart ForFour has more luggage capacity. Smart ForFour has 46 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C1. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Smart ForFour (by 224 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 8.7 meters | 9.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Smart ForFour is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen C1, which means Smart ForFour can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`419 | ~ 1`190 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 8000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForFour has
|
Citroen C1 has
| |