Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Skoda Roomster 2010
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Skoda Roomster. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| 920 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is larger. Skoda Yeti and Skoda Roomster are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`777 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |