Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Skoda Roomster 2010
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Skoda Yeti engine produces 66 HP more power than Skoda Roomster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.4 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is larger. Skoda Yeti and Skoda Roomster are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`664 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |