Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Skoda Yeti engine produces 11 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.0 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.62 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1513 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 7600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
| |