Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Suzuki Vitara 2014

 
Skoda Yeti
2013 -
Suzuki Vitara
2014 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 140 HP120 HP
Torque: 320 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds12.4 seconds
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive.
Skoda Yeti engine produces 20 HP more power than Suzuki Vitara, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.34.2
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km5.3 l/100km
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 315 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres47 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle1110 km in combined cycle
1090 km on highway1170 km on highway
840 km with real consumption880 km with real consumption
Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.18 m
Width: 1.79 m1.78 m
Height: 1.69 m1.61 m
Skoda Yeti is larger.
Skoda Yeti is 5 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 322 litres375 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data710 litres
Suzuki Vitara has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Skoda Yeti has 53 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. This could mean that the Skoda Yeti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1301`870
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

high
Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 800014 600
Pros and Cons: Skoda Yeti has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Suzuki Vitara has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv