Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Yeti and Volkswagen Tiguan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Yeti consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is smaller. Skoda Yeti is 20 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1510 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Skoda Yeti has 65 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 1.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |