Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Mazda CX-3 2015

 
Skoda Yeti
2013 -
Mazda CX-3
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 122 HP120 HP
Torque: 200 NM204 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds9 seconds
Mazda CX-3 is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Yeti engine produces 2 HP more power than Mazda CX-3, but torque is 4 NM less than Mazda CX-3. Despite the higher power, Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.85.9
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Skoda Yeti consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres48 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 880 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway970 km on highway
Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.28 m
Width: 1.79 m1.77 m
Height: 1.69 m1.55 m
Skoda Yeti is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 14 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 405 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1260 litres
Skoda Yeti has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Yeti has 55 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The Mazda CX-3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9401`690
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

high
Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 880014 000
Pros and Cons: Skoda Yeti has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda CX-3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv