Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 160 HP | 103 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 350 NM | 156 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 11.8 seconds | 9.5 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Skoda Yeti petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1513 litres | |
| Skoda Yeti has 5 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`065 | ~ 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 7800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
| |