Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.7 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 - 160 HP | 112 - 175 HP | |
Torque: | 175 - 350 NM | 184 - 305 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 11.8 seconds | 10.3 - 16.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.9 - 10.0 | |
Skoda Yeti petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Tucson. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
Skoda Yeti is smaller. Skoda Yeti is 10 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 644 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1856 litres | |
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Skoda Yeti has 239 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.5 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`065 | ~ 2`171 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 6400 | 3400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |