Skoda Superb 2003 vs Volvo S60 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 42 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Superb consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 210 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Superb consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
| Skoda Superb is 17 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo S60, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |