Skoda Superb 2002 vs Volvo S80 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 29 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.5 | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Superb consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Skoda Superb is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Superb is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1106 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volvo S80, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |