Skoda Superb 2002 vs Rover 75 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 15 HP less power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Rover 75. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 1140 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.43 m | |
| Skoda Superb is 5 cm longer than the Rover 75, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 432 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.4 metres more than that of the Rover 75, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Rover 75 has
| |