Skoda Superb 2002 vs Chevrolet Evanda 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Evanda is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 30 HP less power than Chevrolet Evanda, but torque is 69 NM more than Chevrolet Evanda. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 9.6 | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Superb consumes 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Evanda, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 615 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Skoda Superb is 3 cm longer than the Chevrolet Evanda, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 1.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Evanda, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Chevrolet Evanda has
| |