Skoda Superb 2013 vs Mazda 6 2012

 
Skoda Superb
2013 - 2015
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 140 HP150 HP
Torque: 320 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.1 seconds9.1 seconds
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Superb engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.93.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Superb consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 300 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Superb consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle1580 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1820 km on highway
900 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.84 m4.87 m
Width: 1.82 m1.84 m
Height: 1.46 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 565 litres489 litres
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Superb has 76 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The Mazda 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`117no data
Safety:
Skoda Superb is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda 6 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

above average
Skoda Superb has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably better
Average price (€): 17 2006600
Pros and Cons: Skoda Superb has
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
  • fewer faults
Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv