Skoda Superb 2013 vs Citroen C5 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Superb engine produces 2 HP more power than Citroen C5, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 6.8 | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Superb consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that by driving the Skoda Superb over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Skoda Superb and Citroen C5 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 603 litres | 505 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 98 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`117 | 2`326 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C5 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |