Skoda Superb 2015 vs Volvo V90 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
| Skoda Superb and Volvo V90 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Superb consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1460 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 660 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1526 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Superb has 100 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V90. The Volvo V90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`275 | 2`380 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V90 scores higher in safety tests, butSkoda Superb is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |