Skoda Superb 2002 vs Volvo S60 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Skoda Superb
2002 - 2006
Volvo S60
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Skoda Superb is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo S60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.81.6 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 101 - 193 HP115 - 304 HP
Torque: 172 - 350 NM240 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 - 13.2 seconds6.5 - 10.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5 - 10.94.3 - 9.9
Skoda Superb petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, Skoda Superb equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.63 m
Width: 1.76 m1.87 m
Height: 1.47 m1.48 m
Skoda Superb is 17 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 462 litres380 litres
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Superb has 82 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo S60, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`538~ 2`089
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 18007400
Pros and Cons: Skoda Superb has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv