Skoda Superb 2006 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Skoda Superb is available only with front wheel drive, while Nissan Qashqai can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.8 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 193 HP | 110 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 - 350 NM | 165 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 12.3 seconds | 8.9 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 10.4 | 4.4 - 7.7 | |
|
Skoda Superb petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, Skoda Superb equipped with diesel engines consume 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.59 m | |
| Skoda Superb is 42 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1585 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 32 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 1.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`489 | ~ 1`924 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |