Skoda Superb 2013 vs Kia Optima 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Skoda Superb is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Optima can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 - 3.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.7 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 - 260 HP | 48 - 278 HP | |
Torque: | 250 - 350 NM | 180 - 365 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 10.1 seconds | 9.4 - 11.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 9.3 | 5.1 - 8.1 | |
Skoda Superb petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Optima. On average, Skoda Superb equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb and Kia Optima are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 505 litres | |
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 90 litres more trunk space than the Kia Optima. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Optima. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`128 | ~ 2`049 | |
Safety: | |||
The Skoda Superb scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 17 200 | 9800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Kia Optima has
| |