Skoda Roomster 2006 vs Peugeot 207 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 207 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Roomster engine produces 5 HP less power than Peugeot 207, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 207 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 207, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 207. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 207 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.51 m | |
| Skoda Roomster is 4 cm longer than the Peugeot 207, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1780 litres | 1258 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage capacity. Skoda Roomster has 113 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 207. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 522 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 207. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`758 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 207 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Peugeot 207 has
| |