Skoda Roomster 2007 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Skoda Roomster engine produces 47 HP less power than Skoda Yeti. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller. Skoda Roomster is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1780 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |