Skoda Rapid 2012 vs Seat Toledo 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Skoda Rapid and Seat Toledo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Rapid consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Rapid could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Rapid consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Rapid and Seat Toledo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 55 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1490 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity. Skoda Rapid has 495 litres more trunk space than the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.4 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Skoda Rapid can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`725 | 1`725 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
| |