Skoda Rapid 2017 vs Audi A3 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Skoda Rapid
2017 -
Audi A3
2016 - 2020
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Skoda Rapid is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi A3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel)1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid)

Performance

Power: 90 - 125 HP110 - 190 HP
Torque: 160 - 250 NM200 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 - 11.7 seconds6.2 - 10.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.0 - 4.85.0 - 5.7
Skoda Rapid petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi A3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.31 m
Width: 1.71 m1.79 m
Height: 1.46 m1.44 m
Skoda Rapid is smaller, but slightly higher.
Skoda Rapid and Audi A3 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 415 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1220 litres
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Rapid has 35 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`684~ 1`852
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

high
Average price (€): 780017 200
Pros and Cons: Skoda Rapid has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Audi A3 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv