Skoda Octavia 1997 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 2001

 
Skoda Octavia
1997 - 2000
Mitsubishi Carisma
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 68 HP115 HP
Torque: 130 NM265 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 18.9 seconds10.4 seconds
Mitsubishi Carisma is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Octavia engine produces 47 HP less power than Mitsubishi Carisma, whereas torque is 135 NM less than Mitsubishi Carisma. Due to the lower power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 8.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.25.4
Real fuel consumption: 5.0 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle1110 km in combined cycle
1270 km on highway1360 km on highway
1100 km with real consumption980 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.48 m
Width: 1.73 m1.71 m
Height: 1.43 m1.40 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Octavia is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Carisma, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 528 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1330 litres1050 litres
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Octavia has 98 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 280 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means Skoda Octavia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7701`795
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Mitsubishi Carisma has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Octavia has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Carisma, so Mitsubishi Carisma quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 1000800
Pros and Cons: Skoda Octavia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Mitsubishi Carisma has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv