Skoda Octavia 2009 vs Mazda 6 2010

 
Skoda Octavia
2009 - 2013
Mazda 6
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP170 HP
Torque: 320 NM226 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds8.4 seconds
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Octavia engine produces 30 HP less power than Mazda 6, but torque is 94 NM more than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.78.0
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km8.6 l/100km
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1010 km on highway
930 km with real consumption740 km with real consumption
Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.76 m
Width: 1.77 m1.80 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Skoda Octavia is smaller.
Skoda Octavia is 19 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 560 litres510 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1350 litres1702 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Octavia has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The Mazda 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 352 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 1.6 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Skoda Octavia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9951`970
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Octavia has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 48004200
Pros and Cons: Skoda Octavia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv