Skoda Octavia 2017 vs Mazda 3 2019

 
Skoda Octavia
2017 - 2019
Mazda 3
2019 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 116 HP120 HP
Torque: 250 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds12.4 seconds
Skoda Octavia is more dynamic to drive.
Skoda Octavia engine produces 4 HP less power than Mazda 3, but torque is 100 NM more than Mazda 3. Despite less power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.96.0
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Skoda Octavia consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1280 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
1310 km on highway1010 km on highway
Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.46 m
Width: 1.81 m1.80 m
Height: 1.46 m1.44 m
Skoda Octavia is larger.
Skoda Octavia is 21 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 590 litres295 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1580 litres1019 litres
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Octavia has 295 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 561 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`870no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Average price (€): 11 40021 000
Pros and Cons: Skoda Octavia has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv