Skoda Octavia 1996 vs Skoda Octavia 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Skoda Octavia 1996 is available only with front wheel drive, while Skoda Octavia 2000 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 150 HP | 75 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 235 NM | 126 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 18.9 seconds | 7.9 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 9.2 | 5.0 - 9.0 | |
|
Skoda Octavia 1996 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Octavia 2000. On average, Skoda Octavia 1996 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia 2000. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Octavia 1996 and Skoda Octavia 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1330 litres | 1330 litres | |
| Skoda Octavia 1996 has 2 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Octavia 2000. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`786 | ~ 1`831 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |