Skoda Felicia 1998 vs Peugeot 306 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 17.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Felicia engine produces 6 HP less power than Peugeot 306, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Peugeot 306. Despite less power, Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Felicia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that by driving the Skoda Felicia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Felicia consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Felicia engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Peugeot 206, Citroen Berlingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Felicia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Skoda Felicia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Felicia is 10 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1512 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.4 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306, which means Skoda Felicia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 750 | 1`625 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Peugeot 306 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Peugeot 306, so Peugeot 306 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |