Skoda Felicia 1995 vs Opel Omega 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Felicia engine produces 62 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 81 NM less than Opel Omega. Due to the lower power, Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 9.2 | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Felicia consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Skoda Felicia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Skoda Felicia) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is smaller. Skoda Felicia is 62 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1800 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Skoda Felicia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Opel Omega has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Opel Omega has
| |