Skoda Felicia 1996 vs Seat Cordoba 1996
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 16.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Felicia and Seat Cordoba have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.8 | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Felicia consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Felicia could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 700'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Skoda Felicia is 28 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.5 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba, which means Skoda Felicia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 750 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Seat Cordoba has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |