Skoda Felicia 1997 vs Seat Cordoba 1996
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 99 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.5 seconds | 15.7 seconds | |
| Skoda Felicia engine produces 6 HP less power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Seat Cordoba. Despite less power, Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Felicia consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that by driving the Skoda Felicia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Felicia consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Skoda Felicia is 28 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.5 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba, which means Skoda Felicia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Seat Cordoba has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |