Skoda Felicia 1995 vs Ford KA 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Felicia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Felicia engine produces 8 HP more power than Ford KA, but torque is 5 NM less than Ford KA. Thanks to more power Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
| By specification Skoda Felicia consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Felicia could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is larger. Skoda Felicia is 24 cm longer than the Ford KA, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 186 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 724 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford KA, which means Skoda Felicia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`265 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Skoda Felicia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Felicia, so Skoda Felicia quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Ford KA has
| |