Skoda Felicia 1998 vs Volkswagen Polo 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skoda Felicia is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Polo has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 - 75 HP | 60 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 99 - 135 NM | 116 - 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 - 17.5 seconds | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 6.9 | 5.1 - 9.1 | |
|
Skoda Felicia petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Skoda Felicia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Skoda Felicia is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Felicia is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Skoda Felicia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 838 | ~ 1`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |