Skoda Felicia 1998 vs Peugeot 306 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skoda Felicia is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Peugeot 306 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 - 75 HP | 70 - 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 99 - 135 NM | 111 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 - 17.5 seconds | 10.9 - 17.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 6.9 | 5.2 - 8.4 | |
|
Skoda Felicia petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 306. On average, Skoda Felicia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Felicia is 10 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1512 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.4 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306, which means Skoda Felicia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 838 | ~ 1`615 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |