Seat Inca 1995 vs Volkswagen Polo 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 133 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20 seconds | 17.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Seat Inca engine produces 4 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Seat Inca reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.46 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1436 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
|
Seat Inca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Inca has 1046 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The Volkswagen Polo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`105 | 1`620 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Inca has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |