Seat Ibiza 1997 vs Rover 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.6 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 37 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.8 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ibiza consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 490 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 12 cm shorter than the Rover 200, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1086 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 200, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Rover 200 has
| |