Seat Ibiza 2002 vs Rover 25 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 36 HP less power than Rover 25, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Rover 25. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 25, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 25. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Ibiza engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo, Skoda Felicia | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Accord, Land Rover Freelander, Rover 45 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Ibiza might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ibiza is 4 cm shorter than the Rover 25, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1086 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 39 litres less trunk space than the Rover 25. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 56 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.6 metres more than that of the Rover 25, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Rover 25 has
| |