Seat Ibiza 2002 vs Renault Clio 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 64 HP | 98 HP | |
Torque: | 112 NM | 127 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 34 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
650 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.95 m | 3.81 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
Seat Ibiza is larger. Seat Ibiza is 14 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 255 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1035 litres | |
Seat Ibiza has 10 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 5 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`525 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Renault Clio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Ibiza, so Renault Clio quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Renault Clio has
| |