Seat Ibiza 2002 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 11 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, but torque is 4 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is larger. Seat Ibiza is 7 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 830 litres | |
|
Seat Ibiza has more luggage capacity. Seat Ibiza has 25 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Ibiza (by 200 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |