Seat Ibiza 2012 vs Suzuki Swift 2010

 
Seat Ibiza
2012 - 2015
Suzuki Swift
2010 - 2013
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 70 HP94 HP
Torque: 112 NM118 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.6 seconds12.3 seconds
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Ibiza engine produces 24 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.55.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km6.2 l/100km
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway950 km on highway
700 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.23 m3.85 m
Width: 1.69 m1.70 m
Height: 1.45 m1.51 m
Seat Ibiza is 38 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Ibiza is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres204 litres
Seat Ibiza has more luggage capacity.
Seat Ibiza has 226 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift.
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters9.6 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.9 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5651`480
Safety:
Suzuki Swift is better rated in child safety tests. The Suzuki Swift scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
below average

average
Suzuki Swift has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably better
Average price (€): 5000no data
Pros and Cons: Seat Ibiza has
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
Suzuki Swift has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • hydraulic power steering
  • higher children safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv