Seat Ibiza 1999 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Seat Ibiza and Mitsubishi Colt have the same engine power, but Seat Ibiza torque is 73 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Ibiza gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
| Seat Ibiza and Mitsubishi Colt are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
782 litres | 830 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 48 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Ibiza, so Mitsubishi Colt quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |