Seat Ibiza 2000 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996

 
Seat Ibiza
2000 - 2002
Mitsubishi Colt
1996 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP75 HP
Torque: 126 NM108 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds12.5 seconds
Seat Ibiza and Mitsubishi Colt have the same engine power, but Seat Ibiza torque is 18 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway900 km on highway
650 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.88 m3.88 m
Width: 1.64 m1.68 m
Height: 1.42 m1.36 m
Seat Ibiza and Mitsubishi Colt are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres240 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
782 litres830 litres
Seat Ibiza has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 48 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4451`445
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Seat Ibiza has
  • lower fuel consumption
Mitsubishi Colt has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv