Seat Ibiza 2009 vs Renault Clio 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Clio, but torque is 2 NM more than Renault Clio. Despite less power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
938 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`571 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Renault Clio has
| |