Seat Ibiza 2010 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 78 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Seat Ibiza engine produces 27 HP more power than Alfa Romeo MiTo, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Alfa Romeo MiTo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ibiza is 3 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
938 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Ibiza has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ibiza has 22 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. The Alfa Romeo MiTo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.5 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`560 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo MiTo has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
| |