Seat Ibiza 1999 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.4 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 25 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 6.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.9 | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ibiza consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
| Seat Ibiza and Mitsubishi Colt are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
782 litres | 830 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 48 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`405 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |