Seat Ibiza 2010 vs Renault Clio 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 105 HP | 75 - 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 250 NM | 105 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 16.7 seconds | 9.5 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 5.9 | 4.7 - 7.5 | |
|
Seat Ibiza petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Seat Ibiza equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza and Renault Clio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
430 litres | no data | |
| Seat Ibiza has 9 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`603 | ~ 1`653 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Renault Clio has
| |