Seat Ibiza 1993 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 116 HP | 45 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 166 NM | 76 - 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 16.8 seconds | 10.5 - 21.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 8.6 | 4.7 - 8.6 | |
|
Seat Ibiza petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Seat Ibiza equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Seat Ibiza is 9 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
580 litres | 975 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 25 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 395 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`440 | ~ 1`401 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |