Seat Ibiza 1999 vs Seat Cordoba 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Seat Ibiza
1999 - 2002
Seat Cordoba
1999 - 2003
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 1.91.4 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 50 - 156 HP60 - 110 HP
Torque: 86 - 235 NM116 - 235 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 - 19.4 seconds10.7 - 17.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.9 - 8.44.9 - 8.4
Seat Ibiza petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Cordoba. On average, a Seat Ibiza with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Seat Cordoba.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.88 m4.16 m
Width: 1.64 m1.64 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Seat Ibiza is 28 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 250 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
785 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.4 metres less than that of the Seat Cordoba, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`496~ 925
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Seat Ibiza has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv