Seat Ibiza 1999 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 156 HP | 75 - 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 235 NM | 108 - 141 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 19.4 seconds | 10.5 - 15.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.4 | 6.9 - 8.4 | |
|
Seat Ibiza petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
| Seat Ibiza and Mitsubishi Colt are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
785 litres | 830 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 45 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`496 | ~ 1`471 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |